@StilettoFiend Do you know where your previous meeting is? We can decide based on where that is.
ematsen Glory be! PLOS Computational Biology now has a dedicated methods section. ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3…
@distribecology Condolences, Ted.
(unless you like the in laws)
@distribecology Congrats Ted!
@researchremix Where are the other 39? Pinterest?
researchremix 1 in 40 scholars active on twitter citation is Priem, Costello, Dzuba on figshare: dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.fig… #altmetrics
“GitHub has empowered a new generation of people to collaborate, create, produce.”
bit.ly/13JH7VL
@ctitusbrown I like grumpy Titus!
@kaythaney and wouldn’t exactly solve the kinds of problems @ctitusbrown is talking about? 2/2
@kaythaney @ctitusbrown Correct me if I’m wrong here but isn’t @digitalsci’s catalyst primarily a startup incubator for academic sw? 1/2
hot damn @ctitusbrown is on fire here. → bit.ly/VM9eA2
Nails so many things that are wrong with cyberinfrastructure in science.
@videmsky @nerds4nature Awesome! I’ll do my best to be there.
kaythaney @ctitusbrown interesting! btw, we ( @digitalsci) fund software. our catalyst prog might be of interest for rapid dev: digital-science.com/catalyst/
@chrismentzel @epistemographer @ctitusbrown nails many things perfectly. I’ve already been invited to 2 of → bit.ly/Xtr22J this yr.
@nerds4nature When are you guys getting together next? I want to come nerd out.
scottsimpson You know you're one of the less-respected social sciences when they name a store that sells wispy lady dresses after you.
@kaythaney No hashtag?
#ktapartmentnotmoving
github Introducing Passion Projects github.com/blog/1433-intr…
Passionate plea to restore NASA funding by Neil deGrasse Tyson. Very inspiring video.
n.pr/VLKR5w
@Drew_Lab @labroides Most journals now discourage honorary authorship. Science is the only one that explicitly wrote about it.
@eperlste @ethanwhite @DrWorms Topsy is one provider. I've purchased data from them.
ethanwhite @_inundata You're git paper is one of the '10 most popular datasets in February' datacite.org/node/78 Nicely done!
@duffy_ma mazel tov!
ctitusbrown @kaythaney Would be surprised if more than 5% of published software is available in a form where the *authors* could replicate.
@recology_ woah. This is really cool.
@recology_ @sjGoring This really sucks. How will I afford Google glasses for my future family????
i.imgur.com/ai8l0go.jpg